Developing Tank vs FileMaker Pro
FileMaker Pro databases became a standard for VFX tracking in scripted television because they hold structured show data in a way spreadsheets never managed. An experienced assistant editor could build out a codebook, add custom layouts, and share it across a small team, provided everyone had a FileMaker license.
The license is where the friction starts. FileMaker Pro runs a few hundred dollars per seat, and sharing a multi-user database means paying for FileMaker Server on top of that. Then a formula breaks mid-production, or a script trigger fires twice, or a layout stops rendering, and you spend the afternoon diagnosing FileMaker logic under deadline instead of cutting.
Developing Tank reads the sequence files your team already produces (AVB, AAF, EDL) and finds VFX shots in the marker data. You define your marker rules once per project and the system applies them to every cut. No codebook to rebuild. When the editor recuts and shots move or disappear, change detection flags each one instead of overwriting the tracker behind your back.
The same workflow produces your EDL, AVB, CSV, and PDF outputs, so a vendor turnover package costs you nothing extra in manual pull work. Google Sheets sync covers the departments that still want a spreadsheet, and you keep one record instead of two.
If your team runs FileMaker today and it works, finish the show on it. Start a trial when you are staffing up fresh, onboarding a show where nobody wants to argue about licenses, or facing another codebook rebuild from scratch.
| Feature | Developing Tank | FileMaker Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Auto-detect VFX from files | Yes | No |
| All data entry is manual | No | Yes, every field typed by hand |
| Rebuild per show | No, templates carry forward | Yes, reconfigure every show |
| Requires FileMaker Pro | No | Yes ($625 for a new License) |
| Web-based | Yes | No, desktop app |
| Syncs with Google Sheets | Yes | No |
| Team collaboration | Yes | Only if you pay up for FileMaker Server) |
| Generates AVB/EDL files | Yes | Only if you first write and maintain a script |
| Change detection | Yes | Only if you first write and maintain a script |
| Custom layouts | Structured templates | Fully customizable FileMaker layouts |
| Target user | Assistant Editor | Assistant Editor |
The Verdict
Developing Tank fits better if you rebuild your codebook every show or keep patching FileMaker under deadline. It runs in the browser, pulls shots from your files, and lets the team collaborate without buying FileMaker licenses.